It’s
happening again. Once more, somebody has been less than respectful about Islam,
or the prophet Mohammed, and once more throughout the Islamic world –
particularly the Arab world – enraged mobs are demonstrating before embassies
and consulates, burning them down when they get the chance and not even
stopping short of killing westerners, should they get their hands on them. Whether
it’s Salman Ruhsdie’s Satanic Verses,
a film by Theo van Gogh, caricatures in a Danish newspaper, the provocative burning
of the Qur’an by a lunatic American fundamentalist – any perceived insult to
Islam seems to provoke protest and violence by thousands of adherents of that
religion against the easiest target they can find to which some kind of tenuous
connection can be constructed with those responsible for that insult.
In common
with millions of others, I’m getting really sick of it. I am the last person to
deny that the ordinary – and particularly the poor – people of countries like Egypt, Libya,
the Yemen, Sudan, etc., may have many good reasons to be
angry with the USA,
and western countries in general; reasons associated with colonial history,
economic exploitation, the support of brutal dictators. That’s fine; if they
were (peacefully) protesting about such issues before western embassies
throughout the world, I’d be the first to be cheering them on. But they’re not.
What they are doing, in essence, is protesting at the fact that our societies
allow people to have free opinions and to express those opinions, even if these
opinions are offensive to a few, some, many, or even the majority of their
fellow citizens or the whole population of the planet.
Let me just
get a few things straight – for the record. The film The Innocence of Muslims is a badly made, artistically worthless, obnoxious
piece of junk. I’ve watched a few clips from it on YouTube and I’m not putting
up a link here because, honestly, it’s really not worth viewing and I do not
choose to help its makers reach any more viewers. If you’re really interested,
you can google it easily enough anyway. Moreover, the sole purpose behind it
seems to be to provoke Muslims to precisely the kind of reaction we have been
seeing worldwide in the past days. It is a reprehensible, worthless product of
small-minded, fundamentalist bigots, designed to insult and elicit a violent
reaction from other small-minded fundamentalist bigots. The only real
difference between the Christians initially behind this film and the thousands
of Muslims protesting against it is that most of those Muslims have at least
the excuse of being very poorly educated members of societies without a
democratic secular tradition. Worse, they are being manipulated by more
intelligent, better educated bigots called mullahs or imams, dangerous ideologues
who really want to create some kind of Islamic-theocratic world order by
whatever means they regard as necessary, or cynical people in power who
encourage this kind of thing to divert the attention of the masses they are
exploiting from the real scandals in their societies.
In this
context, I want to look at what has been happening here in Germany a
little more closely. Last week an angry demonstrating mob attacked the German
embassy in Khartoum, Sudan. The demonstrations were
reportedly instigated by a number of Muslim preachers who had picked up on
reports that anti-Islam protests had taken place in Germany this summer, which had
involved caricatures of Mohammed.
Those
reports were true – as far as they go. In the past couple of years, a new
extreme right-wing group has been growing in Germany. It began in Cologne, coalescing
around protests against the building of a large mosque there. In a cynical move
to gain support, the group called itself Pro-Cologne.
It has now organised itself on a national level and calls itself Pro-Deutschland.
Let’s keep
this in perspective. There is a continual, very small minority in Germany which
is consistently prepared to vote for the far right. Such nuts are present in
every country; in Germany
we have been lucky that they have never amounted to more than two or three
percent nationally. In their latest incarnation, they have taken an overt stand
against Islam, realising that they may be able to gain support from many people
worried about the problems arising around the whole question of the integration
of Muslim immigrants into German society.
They have
turned up in my home town of Remscheid
too, where we have quite a substantial Muslim minority (around 12%), mostly of
Turkish origin. On Mayday this year, they announced a demonstration against the
proposed building of a new mosque. A spontaneously formed group (“Remscheid
Tolerant”) quickly called for a counter-demonstration. My regard for the views
represented by Pro-Deutschland being around the level of my enthusiasm for
root-canal work without benefit of anaesthetic, I decided to take part.
It was a
nice, sunny first of May afternoon as a work colleague and I joined of group of
maybe four hundred to march through town to the planned site of the new mosque.
About two thirds of the demonstrators were of Turkish origin, but the rest was
a motley crew, from local politicians to punks and even some representatives of
the near-anarchist Autonome
movement. As my colleague had some friends among those general left-wingers, I
finished up marching with them.
It was fun.
The atmosphere was good humoured and I found myself reflecting on other demonstrations
I had taken part in when I was younger. With a feeling that I was indeed
getting older and more staid, I realised that it had been nine years since my
last demo – the huge protests against the impending Iraq war in 2003.
When we got
to the site of the planned Mosque, the demonstrators from Pro-Deutschland were there – all eleven or twelve of them. They
were a sorry little group, separated from us by around sixty policemen and
women, around half of them in riot gear. They half-heartedly waved a couple of
placards, featuring reproductions of Kurt Westergaard’s famous
Mohammed-as-a-bomb caricature. They tried to chant a couple of slogans, Deutschland für die Deutschen, stuff
like that, but were comprehensively shouted down by our much larger group, the
punks delightedly challenging them to, “Piss off home, you Nazi wankers!” and
inviting them to go fuck themselves. Meanwhile, the politicians and trade union
leaders were making speeches about tolerance and solidarity and a group of Turkish
schoolgirls were doing a folk dance. Just an ordinary demo, a practical public
expression of the democratic rights of anyone to express their opinions in
public. The cops looked attentively bored and there was no suggestion of
violence, though in neighbouring Solingen,
another little group of Pro-Deutschlanders
were stoned by some Salafis
- planned provocation and a planned response. After about an hour everyone went
home.
In the
midst of the current controversy, Pro-Deutschland
have announced that they plan to hire a cinema in Berlin and publicly screen The Innocence of Muslims. There are also
reports that they have invited Terry Jones to attend, that mad Florida pastor who is so
keen on burning Qur’ans. Made nervous by the events in Sudan last
week, and under pressure from various Muslim groups, there are reports that the
German government is looking into the possibility of banning the showing.
That would
be, in my opinion, a mistake. At the core of this issue is not the question of insulting
Muslims, or Mohammed, or Allah, but the question of freedom of opinion and
freedom of expression. And this is a value which is central to any free, open
society.
The freedom
of opinion, of belief, of expression has, at its foundation, the realisation
that people will have different, often contrary opinions, and that no society
has the right to force anyone to believe particular things. This also has the
corollary that no group or section in that society has the right to forbid
others from holding different opinions to themselves, or from expressing them –
even if they find that expression personally offensive, providing that
expression does not infringe on the particular rights of others (as is the case
with libel or slander). There are also limits with regard to questions like
incitement to violence or crime, but otherwise the right to one’s opinion, and
the right to express that opinion, is a central component of any free society.
Religions
often have problems with this necessary aspect of secular society, because
religions tend to claim to possess absolute truth. If Christians are right,
then atheists are wrong – and so are Muslims. If Muslims teach the truth, then
Christians are in error.
Christianity
has two advantages over Islam in this regard. Firstly, it has had over two
hundred years, since the American and French Revolutions to get used to the
idea. Secondly, the modern philosophy of the secular state, as a-theistic as it
may be, evolved initially within Christian dominated cultures. Even so, the
Catholic Church only finally made its peace with modern secular society in the
1960s with the Second Vatican Council (and I frequently think that there are
many among its current leadership who would like to roll that back).
Islam still
has a long way to go here, but it is a road that it must take. No religion has the right to dictate how any modern
society should be organised on the basis of its self-proclaimed divinely
inspired teaching. The very right to freedom of opinion and expression for
everyone, including – especially – those
who think differently than we do, is the only guarantee that any religious
group has for its own security in a multi-cultural world. To claim otherwise
would be to acknowledge that the interpretation of this world religion as held
by Osama bin Laden and the Taliban is implicitly correct. And if that is the
case, then the modern world is indeed at war with Islam and we will all have to
accept that the teachings of this religion are incompatible with the way most people
– including many Moslems – understand themselves and the world.
And so,
much as I find their views disgusting and reprehensible, I must argue that Pro-Deutschland, that ghastly group
against whom I protested a few months ago, should be allowed to go ahead with
their laughable screening of that worthless film. To prohibit it would be to
concede that anyone who claims to be insulted – for whatever reason – by someone
else on religious grounds would have the right to prohibit that other person
from expressing their views. It is an admission of the superiority of religious
beliefs over all other ideas, views, and opinions. It is incompatible with any
vision of an open, tolerant and free society.
In the end,
the whole Muslim perception of insult is rather pitiable anyway. It is a sign,
for me, of a deeply seated insecurity, even a self-perception of inferiority. How
can a God who is as great, compassionate, merciful and all-powerful as Muslims
proclaim Allah to be, really be mocked by the writings of a Salman Rushdie? How
can a man as reputedly wise and blessed as the prophet Mohammed, who has been
dead for nearly 1.400 years, really be insulted by a Danish caricature or a worthless
film produced by a vindictive, criminal American Christian of Coptic origin?
The author
of The Satanic Verses
has been much in my mind while writing this. Twenty three years ago, the
Ayatollah Khomeini spoke a fatwa,
basically condemning Salman Rushdie to death for blasphemy. Rushdie spent many
years under police protection and had to endure major forced changes in his
life because of his literary treatment of the prophet. In an interview in The Guardian
yesterday, he commented on the current controversy,
‘"The
film is clearly a malevolent piece of garbage," says Rushdie. "The
civilised response would be to say of the director: 'Fuck him. Let's get on
with our day.' What's not civilised is to hold America responsible for everything
that happens in its borders. That's crap. Even if that were true, to respond
with physical attacks and believe it's OK to attack people because you're upset
at this thing, that's an improper reaction. The Muslim world needs to get out
of that mindset."’
Pictures retrieved from:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/08/muslim220806_228x266.jpg
Note: The famous quotation from Voltaire isn’t, unfortunately, from him,
but rather attributed to him (as a summary of his position) by Evelyn Beatrice
Hall (1906)
